LNG vs Biofuels vs Hydrogen: A Comparative Analysis for Economic & Sustainable Shipping


Sustainability has become the forefront of global agendas, where the shipping industry faces mounting pressure to reduce its environmental footprint. With about 3% of the total annual carbon emissions, the maritime industry has become one of the main obstacles in the way of achieving sustainable goals.

As the demand for maritime transportation continues to rise, so does the urgency for cleaner fuel alternatives.  Among the contenders in the race for sustainable shipping are Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Biofuels, and Hydrogen.

On the other hand, the maritime industry is working to lessen its environmental impact, and choosing the right fuel is important from both an ecological and financial standpoint. This comparative analysis of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Biofuels, and Hydrogen in shipping aims to explore their environmental merits and economic implications.

Economic and Sustainable Considerations:

Global trade is heavily dependent on the maritime industry as approximately 80% of the shipments are carried through the sea. This statistic also differs from country to country based on the development of the ports.

Therefore, to explore the environmental merits of the maritime industry also needs to sort out the economic implications. To achieve the targeted sustainable goals, the maritime industry needs to obtain strategies that are also viable for the economic aspects.

However, according to the reports published by UNCTAD, this industry runs a large number of outdated fleets that use fossil fuels nearly exclusively. It has contributed to a 20% increase in greenhouse gas emissions over the past ten years. Additionally, It is projected that maritime trade will increase by 2.4% in 2023 and by more than 2% between 2024 and 2028.

As a result, the usage of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Biofuels, and Hydrogen has become a necessity for maritime businesses. Complete decarbonization, by 2050 will necessitate significant financial outlays and may result in increased expenses

Liquified Natural Gas (LNG): Balancing Cost and Environmental Impact

Over time, there has been an increase in demand for LNG. The need for LNG worldwide was 356.06 million tonnes in 2019. Additionally, from 2020 to 2027, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% is anticipated.

LNG has gained traction in maritime transportation due to its relatively lower emissions compared to conventional marine fuels. From an economic standpoint, LNG offers cost savings in compliance with emission regulations such as the IMO 2020 sulfur cap. While initial investments in LNG infrastructure are significant, long-term operational savings through reduced fuel consumption and lower maintenance costs can offset these expenses.

However, the fluctuating natural gas prices and the need for dedicated bunkering facilities add complexity to cost calculations. Moreover, concerns regarding methane leakage and its impact on the environment raise questions about the true cost-effectiveness of LNG as a sustainable fuel option.

Biofuels: Balancing Affordability and Sustainability

The estimated size of the worldwide marine biofuel demand is US$ 3.94 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 7.99 billion by 2034. From 2024 to 2034, the consumption of marine biofuel is expected to grow globally at a 7.3% CAGR.

With the potential to significantly lower carbon emissions, biofuels offer an enticing alternative for environmentally friendly shipping. Biofuels are economically advantageous due to their low retrofitting costs and compatibility with current ship engines and infrastructure. Furthermore, biofuel blending minimizes the upfront costs associated with adoption by allowing for a more gradual rollout.

However, several variables, like the cost of production, the availability of feedstock, and the competition from food crops, affect how economically viable biofuels are. Price fluctuations for feedstocks and worries about changing land uses might affect how affordable and scalable biofuel production is. Biofuels have the potential to benefit the environment, but they face financial obstacles before they can be widely used as an environmentally friendly shipping option.

Hydrogen: Balancing investment costs and long-term benefits

With its potential to be a zero-emission fuel alternative for the maritime sector, hydrogen has enormous environmental benefits in the long run. Hydrogen encounters obstacles with infrastructure investment and manufacturing costs from an economic standpoint. Initial investment barriers include the expensive nature of electrolysis for the manufacture of green hydrogen and the requirement for specialized warehousing and bunkering infrastructure.

Recovering to pre-pandemic levels (91 Mt in 2019), the demand for hydrogen reached 94 million tonnes (Mt) in 2021, with energy equivalent to roughly 2.5% of the world’s ultimate energy consumption. Traditional uses in manufacturing and refining accounted for the majority of the growth, but demand for novel applications increased to roughly 40,000 tonnes (up 60% from 2020, albeit from a minimal baseline).

However, hydrogen’s economic outlook improves with advancements in technology and scale. As renewable energy becomes more abundant and electrolysis processes become more efficient, the cost of green hydrogen is expected to decrease. Additionally, hydrogen’s versatility as an energy carrier opens up opportunities for integration with other sectors, enhancing its economic value proposition in the long run.

Integrating Economic and Environmental Considerations

As an associate of the maritime industry, I believe that the economic viability of fuel choices in sustainable shipping is paramount. While LNG, Biofuels, and Hydrogen present promising solutions, their widespread adoption hinges on their ability to compete in the marketplace.

Collaboration among industry stakeholders, policymakers, and investors is crucial in driving innovation and overcoming barriers to sustainability. In my opinion, by aligning economic considerations with environmental imperatives, the shipping industry can pave the way for a greener and more prosperous future.

This requires a concerted effort to invest in research and development, establishing supportive regulatory frameworks, and incentivizing sustainable practices. Ultimately, by prioritizing both financial feasibility and economic responsibility, we can steer the maritime sector towards a sustainable path, ensuring a healthier planet for future generations.

Investment opportunities: Let’s catch up in a business call

Explore exciting investment opportunities with me! Join me for a business call where we’ll discuss potential ventures in sustainable shipping, focusing on emerging technologies such as LNG, biofuels, and hydrogen.

Together, we can explore lucrative prospects that not only yield financial returns but also contribute to a greener future for the maritime industry.

Let’s get in touch and start this path to long-term success!


In conclusion, achieving sustainable shipping requires maintaining a careful balance between environmental goals and practical economic considerations. Alternatives like LNG, biofuels, and hydrogen may sound promising but implementing them will depend on overcoming obstacles and seizing chances.

Moreover, to promote innovation and a healthy ecosystem, cooperation between investors, lawmakers, and business leaders is essential. By balancing commercial interests with sustainability, the maritime industry may steer towards a more environmentally friendly future.

Through concerted efforts and strategic partnerships, we can not only mitigate environmental impact but also unlock new avenues for growth and prosperity in the global shipping industry. The maritime sector can ensure a greener, more profitable future by setting an agenda that prioritizes both!

References Links:







Leave a Reply